What is the difference between silicate and non-silicate based antifreeze?

Created by Jonathan Fry, Modified on Fri, 16 May at 3:39 PM by Jonathan Fry

Silicate-based and non-silicate-based antifreezes differ primarily in their chemical composition, corrosion protection mechanisms, and compatibility with various engine types. Here’s a concise breakdown:
Silicate-Based Antifreeze
  • Composition: Contains silicates (silicon-oxygen compounds) as a primary corrosion inhibitor, often combined with other inorganic additives like phosphates or borates.
  • Corrosion Protection: Silicates form a protective layer on metal surfaces (e.g., aluminum, iron) to prevent corrosion. This layer can wear off over time, requiring more frequent replacement.
  • Compatibility: Commonly used in older vehicles (pre-1990s) with cast iron or aluminum engines. Not ideal for newer vehicles with advanced alloys or extended-life requirements.
  • Lifespan: Typically lasts 2–3 years or 30,000–60,000 miles due to silicate depletion.
  • Drawbacks: Silicates can form deposits or gels in cooling systems, potentially clogging radiators or water pumps. May be less compatible with some modern seals and gaskets.
  • Example: Traditional green antifreeze (often Inorganic Acid Technology, or IAT).
Non-Silicate-Based Antifreeze
  • Composition: Uses organic acid technology (OAT) or hybrid organic acid technology (HOAT), with inhibitors like carboxylates, sebacates, or phosphates, but no silicates.
  • Corrosion Protection: Organic acids provide longer-lasting protection by targeting corrosion sites specifically, rather than forming a blanket layer. This reduces deposit formation.
  • Compatibility: Designed for modern vehicles with aluminum alloys, copper, or plastic components. Widely used in extended-life coolants for newer cars (post-1990s).
  • Lifespan: Can last 5–10 years or 150,000–300,000 miles, depending on the formulation (OAT or HOAT).
  • Advantages: Fewer deposits, better heat transfer, and compatibility with modern engine materials. Environmentally friendlier due to longer service intervals.
  • Drawbacks: May not provide adequate protection for older engines requiring silicate-based formulas. Can be more expensive.
  • Examples: Dex-Cool (OAT, orange), Glysantin G40 (OAT, red/pink), or HOAT formulas (yellow, like Glysantin G05).
Key Differences
Feature
Silicate-Based
Non-Silicate-Based
Inhibitors
Silicates, inorganic additives
Organic acids (OAT/HOAT)
Lifespan
2–3 years, 30,000–60,000 miles
5–10 years, 150,000–300,000 miles
Engine Compatibility
Older engines (cast iron, aluminum)
Modern engines (aluminum, alloys)
Deposit Formation
Higher (silicate gels/deposits)
Lower (cleaner operation)
Color
Often green
Orange, red, pink, yellow, etc.
Maintenance
More frequent replacement
Extended-life, less maintenance
Choosing the Right Antifreeze
  • Check your vehicle’s owner manual for the recommended coolant type. Using the wrong antifreeze can lead to corrosion, overheating, or seal damage.
  • Never mix silicate and non-silicate antifreezes, as they can react, forming sludge or reducing effectiveness.
  • For older vehicles, silicate-based may be necessary. For newer vehicles, non-silicate (OAT or HOAT) is typically preferred.
If you have a specific vehicle or antifreeze brand in mind, I can help verify compatibility or provide further details!

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article